12 years later, project at center of Bay Area housing battles gets green light

After more than a decade, one of the Bay Area’s most contentious housing battles has finally come to a close.

Over objections from neighbors who sued to halt a 315-unit apartment project slated for the East Bay suburb of Lafayette, the California Supreme Court this week declined to review a lower court’s decision that the development meets state environmental requirements and construction can begin.

Pro-housing advocates cheered the move while at the same time highlighting the 12-year fight as an example of the region’s challenges in building more desperately needed homes.

“This decision is a win for housing, but the fact that this project has taken so long is exactly why we have such a catastrophic housing shortage,” Sonja Trauss, founder of YIMBY Law, said in a statement.

Save Lafayette, the neighborhood group that sued to stop the development, known as Terraces of Lafayette, said officials and courts who have backed the project are ignoring the increased traffic, air pollution and risk of wildfires they say would come with building on the 22-acre site just off Highway 24 in the affluent city.

Michael Griffiths, president of Save Lafayette, said in a statement the group was disappointed but not surprised by the court’s decision.

“We knew that the Supreme Court only accepts about 5% of cases,” Griffiths said.

The move culminates a series of protracted skirmishes that helped galvanize a growing YIMBY — or “Yes In My Backyard” — movement, a new generation of outspoken and sometimes litigious pro-housing activists. The controversy, and the YIMBY coalition it ignited, have since spurred California officials to crack down on growth-averse cities blamed for exacerbating a deepening housing crisis.

In 2016, Trauss gained widespread media attention for suing Lafayette to force the city to approve the embattled Terraces apartment complex. A flood of support poured in for the YIMBY cause. And while that lawsuit ultimately failed — the city would eventually approve the project in 2020 — she and her allies harnessed the newfound energy to create multiple nonprofit advocacy groups, including YIMBY Action, which now has chapters across 17 states.

At home in California, the YIMBY nonprofits would go on to sue many more jurisdictions — often successfully — including Santa Clara County, Palo Alto, Cupertino, Berkeley, Richmond, San Francisco, Huntington Beach and Rancho Palos Verdes.

The decision by the Supreme Court comes less than a month after a state appeals court ruled UC Berkeley violated the California Environmental Protection Act in its plans to build student and homeless housing at historic People’s Park. The court sided with two nonprofit groups that argued UC officials didn’t adequately analyze how much noise could be caused by the roughly 1,100 students who would move into the project.

Source link

Denial of responsibility! insideheadline is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.