“The meeting was cordial, but they expressed the view quite strongly that Penpa Tsering speaking at the club was offensive to China’s interests as he represents a separatist movement and would the club review the invitation,” Reilly said.
“I explained to them that the board of the National Press Club decides on who speaks at our forum and its decisions are independent of governments or other stakeholders.
“I also explained that speakers can put their views and that our media members can ask questions and challenge those views as they see fit.”
Penpa’s predecessor, Lobsang Sangay, appeared at the press club in August 2017.
The position of sikyong, or president, of Tibet’s government-in-exile was created in 2011 when the Dalai Lama decided to relinquish his formal political leadership role and hand responsibility to a democratically elected leader.
Also known as the Central Tibetan Administration, the government-in-exile is based in Dharamshala, India and includes judicial, legislative and executive branches.
Beijing fiercely resists any engagement with the body, which is not recognised as a sovereign government by any country, including Australia.
Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian appeared at the National Press Club in August.Credit: Alex Ellinghausen
Tibetan human rights campaigner Kyinzom Dhongdue, a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile said: “This is yet another case of the Chinese government’s bullying and its efforts to undermine Australian institutions and silence its critics.
“There is no place for Chinese censorship and propaganda in Australia, especially at the National Press Club, a champion for media freedom and free speech.”
Loading
Dhongdue noted that Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian spoke at the press club last year and said: “It is only fair that the leader of the Tibetan people gets the same opportunity.
“Tibetans are all too familiar with China’s long arm of repression in Australia and globally.”
A spokesman for the Chinese embassy declined to comment.
Penpa told the US Congress in March that Tibet would “definitely die a slow death” unless the Chinese government was forced to change its current policies.
Three United Nations experts last year declared: “We are alarmed by what appears to be a policy of forced assimilation of the Tibetan identity into the dominant Han-Chinese majority, through a series of oppressive actions against Tibetan educational, religious and linguistic institutions.”
Around 1 million children of the Tibetan minority were being given a “compulsory education” curriculum in Mandarin Chinese without access to traditional or culturally relevant learning, the special rapporteurs found.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.
Denial of responsibility! insideheadline is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
