Data next battle for Facebook, social media giants

“Let’s face it, the aim of these platforms is to keep your eyes [glued] and the scrolling going as long as possible, but is it useful to understand which cohorts are being impacted by that.”

“Age groups, gender, and I think it is always a particular concern when minors are being targeted as well,” said Rowland.

“It is an area of such import that it does require the ability for regulators to be able to obtain information to inform governments.”

Communications minister Michelle Rowland

Platforms typically release only partial information in their transparency reports, showing for example how many posts were taken down for spreading false claims about COVID-19 but not what they claimed, how many were left online or who distributed them.

Rowland is clear that the Labor government, elected just four weeks ago, has an open mind on what the data might show and therefore how the government might respond, refusing to commit to following the previous government’s plans to make the industry codes potentially enforceable. She also won’t say whether any data gathered by the media authority will be made public.

Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, drew criticism late last year when a whistleblower revealed internal research suggesting teen girls felt it worsened their mental health. It rejected unfavourable characterisations of the research and later made some of the reports public.

“We’ve learned recently about Instagram doing some research on body image issues and the way that that is impacting [teens],” Rowland said. “I actually welcome that.”

Were companies willing to share more data publicly, it might defuse some criticisms of the sector, Rowland argues. But she is circumspect about the possibility of getting access to the algorithms that determine who sees what online. “I don’t know of a government that’s gotten to the bottom of this yet,” Rowland said.

The government retains a big stick with which to hit Meta if relations sour. Last year the Morrison government passed laws requiring social media companies to pay traditional news publishers. If they did not, then they could be “designated” by the Treasurer, putting them on a path to forced payments. Meta and Google have struck multimillion-dollar deals with several media organisations, including the ABC, Guardian, News Corp and Nine (which owns this masthead) but the Facebook owner has refused to pay the SBS and academic website The Conversation.

“It is a priority to ensure the viability of a diversity of voices and the SBS, as a public broadcaster, and The Conversation, as a player in this space, are very important to that,” Rowland said. “So we’ll be having a look at [designation].”

Rowland reiterated Labor’s commitment to ensure major sporting events are freely accessible for all Australians to view, which is being imperilled as wealth overseas streaming service circle broadcast rights. She said, too, that the government planned to introduce rules forcing smart TV makers to make it easy for Australians to find locally-owned services, which was another Labor election commitment.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

Source link

Denial of responsibility! insideheadline is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.