The decision to remove Shamima Begum’s British citizenship was lawful, a court has ruled despite finding that she may have been trafficked for sexual exploitation by Isis.
In the latest stage of the former Isis bride’s legal battle against the British government, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) had considered arguments that she was made “de-facto stateless”.
A summary of the judgment said there was “credible suspicion” that Begum had been trafficked to Syria for sexual exploitation as a child, and “arguable breaches of duty” by state bodies who failed to stop her leaving the UK.
But Mr Justice Jay found that those factors were not a bar to her British citizenship being removed, and that issues around whether Begum travelled to Syria voluntarily and poses a threat “are for the secretary of state to evaluate and not for the commission”.
“The commission has been unable to conclude that the secretary of state erred in any material respect,” the ruling said.
The judgment, which could be appealed by Begum’s team, means that she currently has no prospect of being returned to the UK from a detention camp where she is being held with women and children captured during the fall of Isis territories.
She travelled to Syria with two other girls from Bethnal Green Academy in February 2015, just months after another teenage girl from the school made the same journey.
Begum and her friends were spoken to by police because of their link to Sharmeena Begum, who was not a relation, but her relatives were not told.
Officers gave a letter warning of Sharmeena’s departure to the three girls and other Bethnal Green Academy pupils, but they did not pass it on to their parents before they fled the UK.
At a hearing in November, Begum’s lawyers argued that the British government did not formally assess whether she was a victim of trafficking before putting her in “exile for life”.
They told the court that the 23-year-old, who travelled to join Isis in Syria aged 15 eight years ago, was “groomed” for the purpose of having sex with adult fighters and bearing their children.
Begum’s first two children died as infants and the third, born shortly after she was found by a journalist in a detention camp in 2019, died at less than three weeks old.
At a previous hearing in February 2020, SIAC ruled that the decision to remove her British citizenship was lawful as Begum was “a citizen of Bangladesh by descent”, but her lawyers said she had been made “de-facto stateless”.
Then-home secretary Sajid Javid was accused of acting with “extreme speed” by removing her nationality four days after The Times published an interview with Begum in a detention camp.
But lawyers representing the Home Office had argued that there were no errors of law in Mr Javid’s decision and that the government did not accept Begum was trafficked.
An MI5 officer, known only as witness E, said the service had made a national security assessment regarding Begum and that it “recognises that victims can very much be a threat, if indeed someone is a victim of trafficking”.
When asked whether MI5 had sought any expert advice before reaching its conclusion that Begum had travelled to Syria voluntarily, he added: “In my mind it is not conceivable that an intelligent and articulate 15-year-old could not know what Isis was doing, so in some respects yes, I do believe she would have known what she was doing and had agency in doing so.”
Sir James Eadie KC, for the Home Office, said in written submissions that the security services “continue to assess that Begum poses a risk to national security”.
SIAC heard that the government had confirmed that a man called Mohammed al-Rashed transported Begum and two school friends across the Turkey-Syria border on 20 February 2015.
A book by Richard Kerbaj alleged that he was passing intelligence to Canadian intelligence services at the time but the UK has not confirmed the claim, or whether British authorities were passed any information before Begum reached Syria.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “We are pleased that the court has found in favour of the government’s position in this case.
“The government’s priority remains maintaining the safety and security of the UK and we will robustly defend any decision made in doing so.”
Denial of responsibility! insideheadline is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.