“And it pains me – that this part of my role – may injure, infuriate and, potentially, alienate people from an already marginalised community.
“Believe me, I have wrestled long and hard with myself, with what to say and do. I am aware that my actions and words, no matter what I say, will anger some people – whether they are from the [transgender] community or from the cisgender female community.”
Many athletes had been afraid to speak out over the issue but others, like former British swimmer and advocate for a more aggressive transgender policy Sharron Davies, hailed it as a victory for common sense.
“I can’t tell you how proud I am of my sport, FINA and the FINA president for doing the science, asking the athletes and coaches, and standing up for fair sport for females,” Davies said.
“Swimming will always welcome everyone, no matter how you identify, but fairness is the cornerstone of sport.”
Now the wait begins to see the ramification for other elite sports and whether the ruling will trickle down to the community level, something that has long been feared by transgender advocates and other experts in the field.
Dr Catherine Ordway from the University of Canberra, a leading voice in sport integrity, said FINA had simply found the issue too complex and ended up “taking a hammer to a walnut” with their policy.
“That’s exactly what has happened. They have just put a blanket ban over all transgender athletes instead of taking a nuanced, sophisticated approach where we treat case as an individual, which is the smart thing to do,” Ordway said.
“The reality is there aren’t that many transgender athletes and there aren’t that many who want to swim. What they are doing at FINA is saying you can’t compete, at all, in any of our disciplines, whether it’s synchronised swimming or water polo or diving.
“That means now and forever. You can’t compete in Masters swimming when you are 70 if you transitioned when you were 18. How is that fair? I don’t quite understand why they are taking a hammer to a walnut.”
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) updated its transgender policies after the Winter Olympics in Beijing but its document was criticised for lacking substance, overflowing with platitudes and handballing the issue back to the sports.
Now it has come home to roost for the IOC, which preaches inclusiveness but only managed to empower the powerbrokers of one of its biggest sports to take the most dramatic action yet seen by administrators.
Having Thomas swim at the Paris Olympics would have created one of the highest-profile controversies at a modern Games. FINA had squashed that prospect two years out, potentially saving them and the IOC from a media circus in France.
Should other major sports draw inspiration from the tough stance of swimming officials, the great transgender sporting debate could be over before it really began.
News, results and expert analysis from the weekend of sport sent every Monday. Sign up for our Sport newsletter.
Denial of responsibility! insideheadline is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.