Superannuation tax breaks: winding back concessions for the wealthy would not be not a major change: Anthony Albanese

On Wednesday, Albanese said Labor had committed to not making major changes to superannuation ahead of last year’s election and that remained the government’s intention. He also noted that tax breaks for super were projected to cost the budget more than the aged pension in coming years.

“What we’re talking about here is there’s nothing that impacts the sustainability of the system from punters out there who have got $150,000 in their accounts,” he said at the National Press Club on Wednesday.

“That’s not an issue at all, which is the average. We said during the election campaign that we did not intend to make big changes to superannuation. And we don’t.”

Labor promised in April last year before the election it would make some changes to super, including enshrining a definition of superannuation in law, and that it would make alterations to the way funds are managed and regulated.

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees has called for a limit of $5 million in super accounts, saying the concessions were inequitable. The Grattan Institute has suggested a tax threshold of $2 million on super earnings, allowing people to stash as much money as they liked in their super but imposing a higher rate of tax on funds over that amount.

Increasing that tax rate would bring in an additional $1.5 billion a year, the Institute’s economic policy program director Brendan Coates said.

Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor said the government risked “leaving Australian retirees in the cold”.Credit:Getty Images

“There is $300 billion in super, in accounts that have more than $2 million,” Coates said.

”That’s nearly as much money in super as what everyone with a balance under $100,000 has, which is two-thirds of Australians.”

Earlier on Wednesday Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones said the government did not have a final view on changes to those concessions.

“I’m not going to say we’re not thinking about it, clearly we are,” he told ABC News Breakfast.


“If we all agree that the purpose of superannuation is to provide income in retirement, it beggars belief you could have $100 million in a superannuation account attracting very generous tax concessions.”

Australian Taxation Office figures from 2019 showed the top 100 self-managed super fund accounts all had balances of more than $50 million, and were worth a combined $9.64 billion. At the time, more than 27 accounts had more than $100 million.

Jones said the country needed to have a debate about the tax breaks and the government has to look at it.

“What we’re thinking about is what is a reasonable amount of money, which is consistent with that objective of having tax-assisted savings for retirement income,” he said.

“Let me be very clear. This is not about saying people can’t save more than $5 million, $10 million, $100 million for their retirement.

“We’re saying what is a reasonable contribution that the Australian taxpayer, through the budget, should be making to assisting people save for retirement incomes?”

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.

Source link

Denial of responsibility! insideheadline is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.