Wimbledon ban ‘a damaging precedent’? Tell that to the people of Mariupol

The handful of Russian and Belarusian tennis players affected can be thought of as collateral damage. It might irritate them a little now, but soon enough they will be swanning around the world again, relief only ever one good massage away. Both they, and their rankings, will recover.

The tens of thousands of innocent war dead collateral in Ukraine won’t swan anywhere ever again. In their mass graves, they’re beyond recovery.

Sergiy Stakhovsky in his finest hour, beating Roger Federer at Wimbledon in 2013.Credit:AP

And please, please, don’t try that most tired and discredited of tropes about how sport and politics shouldn’t mix. They’re joined at the hip, head and heart.

Wimbledon is not merely an annual tennis tournament administered by the all-England club in SW19. It is synonymous with England’s cultural identity and an icon of the centrality of sport in world affairs. It simply cannot choose to belong to that world or keep at a distance as convenient.

Wimbledon recognises this. It imposed its ban under advisement from the UK government. “We remain unwilling to accept success or participation at Wimbledon being used to benefit the propaganda machine of the Russian regime, which, through its closely controlled state media, has an acknowledged history of using sporting success to support a triumphant narrative to the Russian people,” it said.

Please, please, don’t try that most tired and discredited of tropes about how sport and politics shouldn’t mix. They’re joined at the hip, head and heart.

Lamely, the ATP says Wimbledon could have left it up to individual players to compete as neutrals, signing declarations disowning Russia’s war. Correctly, Wimbledon says this would endanger them and their families. Whether they won’t or can’t speak up, Wimbledon is sparing them.

Novak Djokovic wins Wimbledon in 2021.

Novak Djokovic wins Wimbledon in 2021.Credit:Getty

The ATP/WTA decision to withhold ranking points for Wimbledon is as perverse as it is tone-deaf. For one, it is self-sabotage. Never mind that Wimbledon is privately run, which has long bugged the player bodies, it is the prize they all covet. Expect most, if not all, of the big names to play anyway, literally pointlessly.

For another, it means that even if Novak Djokovic defends his title, he will lose the 2000 points that came with it, practically assuring Daniil Medvedev of overtaking him as No.1. Medvedev, in case you have forgotten, is Russian.

By this tit-for-tat, the ATP and WTA are cutting off their noses to spite their faces. Go ahead then. It’s an unnecessary disfiguring, but it will heal. The tens of thousands of dead in Ukraine won’t, nor the ruined lives of millions of their displaced countrymen, nor for many decades their country’s heart.

The ATP says Wimbledon’s stance “again highlights the need for a united governance structure across professional tennis so that decisions of this nature can be made in a joint manner”. No, it highlights a bloody warmonger and his bloody war machine, and his bloody awful war.

News, results and expert analysis from the weekend of sport sent every Monday. Sign up for our Sport newsletter.

Source link

Denial of responsibility! insideheadline is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.